Residues of plant protection products (PPPs) are inevitably present in or on food, even when they are applied in line with good agricultural practice. The upper limit of residue permitted on food or feed is the ‘maximum residue level’ (MRL), which, in Europe, is legislated by the European Commission based on scientific advice from the (EFSA).
MRLs are measured via crop residue field trials, which replicate the real-life agricultural conditions under which a PPP would be used. It sounds a simple enough procedure, but what studies are commonly used and what are the secrets to success?
The new EU requirements for endocrine disruptor identification will impact any active ingredient (AI) renewals with expected decisions from November 2018 onwards. Learn more about these requirements and key strategies to meet them, below[CS1][CS2].
The European Commission has adopted new criteria for identifying endocrine disruptors (EDs) – these criteria apply to new active ingredients (AIs) and those going through renewal (). So, if the AIs in your plant protection products (PPPs) are due for renewal you need to understand the new requirements and how you can meet them.
The regulation that governs the marketing, sale, and use of pesticides is just a fact of life, but the standards imposed are constantly evolving as our scientific insight and knowledge increases. This series of informational blogs is designed to examine how existing active substances (ASs) are managed through the current regulatory renewal systems in the EU and USA.
We have been using chemicals to protect plants from pests and diseases since 2,500 BC, when, as records show, ancient Sumerians used sulfur to control mites/insects. However, it was really towards the end of the 19th century that the industrial usage of inorganic products and those derived naturally, such as pyrethrum, became common and widespread.
As the regulatory landscape
across the globe is rapidly evolving, more sophisticated requirements must be
met by registrants and scientists. In parallel, scientific advances have
impacted previous methodologies that were once seen as cutting edge but now may
fail to adequately address new regulatory challenges.
Clients should consider
techniques to future-proof their studies to flexibly adapt to pre- and post-registration
regulatory and scientific environments and keep up with trends in the crop