Listening To – and Learning From – the Voice of the Patient

Patient recruitment represents the biggest challenge in clinical trials. From general patient identification and participation to reducing screen failure rate or limiting patient drop out after enrollment, drug developers face many massive pain points to initiate their clinical trials.  

Patient recruitment and retention continue to be the biggest challenge in clinical studies. Designing protocols with patient needs in mind will lead to higher levels of better clinical research recruitment, drive up participation rates and save both time and money.

Continue reading

Covance & FDNA to Develop Novel Program to Accelerate and Improve The Accuracy of Rare Disease Patient Recruitment for Clinical Studies

FDNA, a digital health company at the forefront of artificial intelligence (AI), genomics and precision medicine, and Covance will work together to create a new, innovative approach to clinical study recruitment for rare diseases.

Image of Futuristic Globe

Continue reading

Mining Real-World Data With Cutting-Edge Analytical Tools: Helping to Achieve Patient Recruitment Targets

In 1848, the most famous Gold Rush in American history began at Sutter’s Mill near present-day Coloma, California, shaping the US economic map forever. In those days, there were no scientific tools to guide prospectors in their search. Sites of previous finds were the starting point for what became, for many, a shattered dream.

Continue reading

Pop Quiz: What’s Your Patient Centricity IQ?

What issues do patients cite as barriers to clinical study participation? How far are they willing to travel to participate in a study and how much more willing are they to participate knowing that their physician is aware of the study?Patient Centricity Quiz

We asked these questions – and more – to group of 135,000 people who opted in to the LabCorp database to receive more information about Covance clinical studies. More than 2,500 responded to our survey, providing our team with unique insights to better understand the patient mindset and design more effective recruitment strategies.

Next, to see if our colleagues in the drug development industry could surmise our participants’ aggregate answers from this survey, we delivered a short pop quiz. Any attendees who stopped by our booth at the 2017 Drug Information Association annual meeting (DIA), had a chance to take the quiz and see how they fared. Continue reading

An Analytical Approach to Enhance Recruitment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

No single blood test or physical finding alone can confirm the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, two tests that detect markers of inflammation are often ordered when RA is suspected: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Other common tests include rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP antibodies.

RA Map

RA patients in the United States

While the test results are clearly valuable to the requesting physician to inform diagnostic decisions, sponsors can also leverage this information to support patient recruitment in an increasingly competitive space. We recently evaluated how de-identified patient data from these common tests run by LabCorp can support sponsors’ clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. Continue reading

Finding the Other 90%: Attracting Naïve Patients to RA Studies

A recent study by Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, based on a survey of 2,000 physicians and nurses primarily in the United States and Europe, found that 91% of physicians feel ‘somewhat’ or ‘very’ comfortable discussing the opportunity to participate in a clinical trial with patients, but actually refer less than 0.2% of their patients into clinical trials.1 In conjunction, more than 80% of patients Attracting Naïve Patients to RA Clinical Studies say they are willing to participate in clinical research studies, but only around 10% actually do so.2 It is further reported that while 85% of patients are generally comfortable presenting any clinical research information they find to their doctor, only 17% have actually done so.3 And what of those patients that are interested in participating in a clinical study only to find they are ineligible? When queried on next steps after finding out he/she did not qualify, 36% stopped looking for a clinical research study to participate in.3 This latter fact is a staggering waste of potential when you consider that there are currently >130 planned or ongoing industry-sponsored Phase II-III rheumatoid arthritis (RA) studies to choose from (>210 when you consider any type of study sponsor).4
Continue reading